From: Habitat suitability models of mountain ungulates: identifying potential areas for conservation
 | Predicted suitability category ( i ) | Proportion of suitable category ( p i ) | Observed frequency in the i th habitat category (O) | Expected frequency of species observation in the i th habitat category ( p i O+) | Proportional frequency in the habitat category ( p i O/ p i O+) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Barking deer | Poorly suitable | 0.18 | 4 | 9.36 | 0.08 |
Moderately suitable | 0.19 | 7 | 9.75 | 0.13 | |
Suitable | 0.33 | 14 | 16.91 | 0.27 | |
Highly suitablea | 0.31 | 27 | 15.98 | 0.52 | |
Himalayan goral | Poorly suitable | 0.38 | 7 | 24.11 | 0.11 |
Moderately suitable | 0.26 | 16 | 16.43 | 0.25 | |
Suitable | 0.32 | 28 | 20.19 | 0.44 | |
Highly suitablea | 0.04 | 12 | 2.27 | 0.19 | |
Himalayan serow | Poorly suitablea | 0.13 | 1 | 4.89 | 0.03 |
Moderately suitablea | 0.23 | 3 | 8.70 | 0.08 | |
Suitablea | 0.24 | 14 | 9.18 | 0.37 | |
Highly suitablea | 0.40 | 20 | 15.24 | 0.53 |