Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Nile perch population statistics

From: Evolutionary history of Nile perch Lates sp. inferred from mitochondrial DNA variation analyses

Group Population n N h π D P FS P FS τ θ 0 θ 1 N 0 N 1 Hri
East Africa Albert Lake 9 4 0.583 ± 0.183 0.00963 ± 0.0017 -1.037 0.16 2.217 0.88 20.43 0.250 25,513.639 70.90 8,386,680.09 0.339
Kyoga Lake 10 3 0.644 ± 0.101 0.00207 ± 0.0007 -0.431 0.32 0.345 0.48 1.048 0.006 89,037.437 1.17 25,557,965.10 0.127
Nabugabo Lake 6 5 0.933 ± 0.122 0.01570 ± 0.0074 -0.940 0.23 0.240 0.46 2.251 0.080 81,810.182 25.97 24,164,312.56 0.164
Chamo Lake 4 3 0.833 ± 0.222 0.00259 ± 0.0008 0.592 0.83 -0.658 0.15 2.408 0.255 90,394.584 44.64 26,747,561.57 0.250
Turkana Lake 8 4 0.786 ± 0.113 0.00302 ± 0.0005 0.717 0.80 -0.621 0.20 1.622 0.064 82,186.554 14.59 23,426,793.30 0.087
Victoria Lake 72 24 0.865 ± 0.033 0.00934 ± 0.0017 -1.222 0.08 -8.328 0.01 2.279 0.203 50,336.038 69.74 15,089,660.07 0.021
West Africa Senegal River 15 9 0.845 ± 0.008 0.00461 ± 0.0012 -1.489 0.07 -4.319 0.01 1.606 0.034 79,119.289 11.09 23,117,407.51 0.104
  1. Population age ranges are given with 95% confidence intervals of τ for 1,000 mismatch distribution replicates. n, sample size; N, number of haplotypes; h, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; D, Tajima's test; P, p value of Tajima's test; FS, Fu's FS test; P FS, p value of the FS test; τ, tau; θ 0, theta at time 0; θ 1, theta at the time of the recorded measure; N 0, population at time 0; N 1, population at the time of the recorded measure; Hri, Harpending raggedness index.