Evolutionary history of Nile perch Lates sp. inferred from mitochondrial DNA variation analyses

Zoological Studies

Table 1 Nile perch population statistics

Group	Population	n	N	h	π	D	P	FS	P _FS	τ	θ ₀	θ ₁	N ₀	N ₁	Hri
East Africa	Albert Lake	9	4	0.583 ± 0.183	0.00963 ± 0.0017	-1.037	0.16	2.217	0.88	20.43	0.250	25,513.639	70.90	8,386,680.09	0.339
	Kyoga Lake	10	3	0.644 ± 0.101	0.00207 ± 0.0007	-0.431	0.32	0.345	0.48	1.048	0.006	89,037.437	1.17	25,557,965.10	0.127
	Nabugabo Lake	6	5	0.933 ± 0.122	0.01570 ± 0.0074	-0.940	0.23	0.240	0.46	2.251	0.080	81,810.182	25.97	24,164,312.56	0.164
	Chamo Lake	4	3	0.833 ± 0.222	0.00259 ± 0.0008	0.592	0.83	-0.658	0.15	2.408	0.255	90,394.584	44.64	26,747,561.57	0.250
	Turkana Lake	8	4	0.786 ± 0.113	0.00302 ± 0.0005	0.717	0.80	-0.621	0.20	1.622	0.064	82,186.554	14.59	23,426,793.30	0.087
	Victoria Lake	72	24	0.865 ± 0.033	0.00934 ± 0.0017	-1.222	0.08	-8.328	0.01	2.279	0.203	50,336.038	69.74	15,089,660.07	0.021
West Africa	Senegal River	15	9	0.845 ± 0.008	0.00461 ± 0.0012	-1.489	0.07	-4.319	0.01	1.606	0.034	79,119.289	11.09	23,117,407.51	0.104

Population age ranges are given with 95% confidence intervals of τ for 1,000 mismatch distribution replicates. n, sample size; N, number of haplotypes; h, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; D, Tajima's test; P, p value of Tajima's test; FS, Fu's FS test; P _FS, p value of the FS test; τ, tau; θ ₀, theta at time 0; θ ₁, theta at the time of the recorded measure; N ₀, population at time 0; N ₁, population at the time of the recorded measure; Hri, Harpending raggedness index.