
C
_{1}

C
_{2}

C
_{3}


P
_{E} vs D
_{3D}
   
R
_{1}

0.51^{a}

0.98

0.97

R
_{2}

0.73

0.99

0.99

R
_{3}

0.80

0.92

0.92

P
_{E} vs V
   
R
_{1}

0.65

0.97

0.97

R
_{2}

0.73

0.99

0.98

R
_{3}

0.78^{b}

0.88

0.88

 Coefficients of regressions r
^{2} of the fits shown in Figure 4 of the predation risk P
_{E} as a function of track convolution (D
_{3D}) and in Figure 5 of P
_{E} as a function of swimming speed (V) in the different abundance (C
_{1}, C
_{2} and C
_{3}) and predator detection radius (R
_{1}, R
_{2} and R
_{3}). In the P
_{E} vs D
_{3D} case, the regressions were exponential except for C
_{1}
R
_{1} (^{a}best fit: linear), while in the P
_{E} vs V one they were linear with the exclusion of C
_{1}
R
_{3} (^{b}best fit: exponential).