Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 P E vs D 3D and P E vs V

From: Behaviour-dependent predation risk in swimming zooplankters

  C 1 C 2 C 3
P E vs D 3D    
R 1 0.51a 0.98 0.97
R 2 0.73 0.99 0.99
R 3 0.80 0.92 0.92
P E vs V    
R 1 0.65 0.97 0.97
R 2 0.73 0.99 0.98
R 3 0.78b 0.88 0.88
  1. Coefficients of regressions r 2 of the fits shown in Figure 4 of the predation risk P E as a function of track convolution (D 3D) and in Figure 5 of P E as a function of swimming speed (V) in the different abundance (C 1, C 2 and C 3) and predator detection radius (R 1, R 2 and R 3). In the P E vs D 3D case, the regressions were exponential except for C 1 R 1 (abest fit: linear), while in the P E vs V one they were linear with the exclusion of C 1 R 3 (bbest fit: exponential).