|
a
0
|
E
|
a
2
|
r
2
|
p value
|
n
|
MSE of cross-validation
|
---|
(growth constant)
|
(activation energy)
|
(size coefficient)
|
---|
Method 1
|
3.11 (±11.26)
|
0.16 (±0.29)
|
-0.55 (±0.17)
|
0.12
|
0.01
|
72
|
1.97
|
Method 2
|
-2.52 (±9.76)
|
-0.00 (±0.25)
|
-0.33 (±0.13)
|
0.09
|
0.04
|
74
|
1.13
|
Method 3
|
15.73 (±11.82)
|
0.46 (±0.31)
|
-0.31 (±0.12)
|
0.14
|
<0.01
|
76
|
0.80
|
Expected value
| |
0.6 to 0.7
|
-0.25
| | | | |
- The regression coefficients were calculated according to the function ln=
0+
1
+. The methods are as follows: (1) average value, (2) mode value, and (3) multiple-peak consideration. Values in parentheses are bootstrap estimates of standard error of coefficients. g, weight-specific growth rate (1/day); M, body mass (μg); T, temperature (K); E, activation energy (eV), E = -a
1 × k; k, Boltzmann's constant (eV/K); n, sample size; MSE of cross-validation, mean squared error calculated from the 10-fold cross-validation analysis.