|
a
0
|
E
|
a
2
|
r
2
|
p value |
n
| MSE of cross-validation |
---|
(growth constant) | (activation energy) | (size coefficient) |
---|
Method 1 | 3.11 (±11.26) | 0.16 (±0.29) | -0.55 (±0.17) | 0.12 | 0.01 | 72 | 1.97 |
Method 2 | -2.52 (±9.76) | -0.00 (±0.25) | -0.33 (±0.13) | 0.09 | 0.04 | 74 | 1.13 |
Method 3 | 15.73 (±11.82) | 0.46 (±0.31) | -0.31 (±0.12) | 0.14 | <0.01 | 76 | 0.80 |
Expected value | | 0.6 to 0.7 | -0.25 | | | | |
- The regression coefficients were calculated according to the function ln=
0+
1
+. The methods are as follows: (1) average value, (2) mode value, and (3) multiple-peak consideration. Values in parentheses are bootstrap estimates of standard error of coefficients. g, weight-specific growth rate (1/day); M, body mass (μg); T, temperature (K); E, activation energy (eV), E = -a
1 × k; k, Boltzmann's constant (eV/K); n, sample size; MSE of cross-validation, mean squared error calculated from the 10-fold cross-validation analysis.