|
a
0
|
E
|
a
2
|
r
2
|
p value |
n
| MSE of cross-validation |
---|
(growth constant) | (activation energy) | (size coefficient) |
---|
Method 1 | 13.48 (±7.99) | 0.44 (±0.21) | -0.60 (±0.08) | 0.20 | <0.01 | 168 | 0.71 |
Method 2 | 11.21 (±8.06) | 0.39 (±0.21) | -0.71 (±0.09) | 0.28 | <0.01 | 181 | 0.72 |
Method 3 | 14.13 (±6.34) | 0.44 (±0.16) | -0.49 (±0.06) | 0.26 | <0.01 | 189 | 0.43 |
Expected value | | 0.6 to 0.7 | -0.25 | | | | |
- The regression coefficients were calculated according to the function ln=
0+
1
+a. The methods are as follows: (1) average value, (2) mode value, and (3) multiple-peak consideration. Values in parentheses are bootstrap estimates of the standard error of coefficients. g, weight-specific growth rate (1/day); M, body mass (μg); T, temperature (K); E, activation energy (eV), E = -a
1 × k; k, Boltzmann's constant (eV/K); n, sample size; MSE of cross-validation, mean squared error calculated from the 10-fold cross-validation analysis.