The poorly known genus Ventrifurca Roewer, 1913 revisited (Opiliones: Cranaidae)
© Villarreal et al. 2015
Received: 22 September 2014
Accepted: 29 April 2015
Published: 7 June 2015
The distinction of genera in Cranaidae (as in many other Gonyleptoidea) is traditionally made on the basis of a combination of armature of scutal areas, tarsomere counts, and some secondary sexual structures (which may vary among males). This historically led to the creation of non-natural groups of species as meaningless genera. Here some nominal genera of Cranaidae are addressed, and this paucity of diagnostic characters is alleviated with more detailed diagnoses and descriptions.
The poorly known genus Ventrifurca Roewer, 1913, hitherto monotypic, is revisited. The genera Microcranaus Roewer, 1913 (with three species), Cayabeus Roewer, 1932 (monotypic), and Angistrius (monotypic) are here proposed as junior subjective synonyms of Ventrifurca. Both type species of Microcranaus and Cayabeus are considered junior subjective synonyms of Ventrifurca albipustulata; thus, Cayabeus perlatus Roewer, 1932 and Microcranaus pustulatus Roewer, 1913 = Ventrifurca albipustulata Roewer, 1913. Ventrifurca abnormis comb. nov. is proposed for Angistrius abnormis Roewer, 1932. Rhopalocranaus dybasi Goodnight & Goodnight, 1947, currently Neocranaus dybasi, is transferred to Ventrifurca, and the new combination Ventrifurca dybasi comb. nov. is herein proposed for it. Ventrifurca albipustulata is redescribed, and for the first time, the male genitalia is described and illustrated, and SEM pictures are offered. The new species Ventrifurca caffeinica sp. nov. is described from Quindío department, Colombia. A new diagnosis to Ventrifurca is proposed. The relationships of Ventrifurca are discussed. The remaining two species of Microcranaus are transferred to the family Manaosbiidae: (1) Microcranaus columbianus newly combined as Rhopalocranaus columbianus (Roewer, 1963) and (2) Microcranaus gracilis newly combined as Camelianus gracilis (Roewer, 1913). New diagnoses are given for both species.
A non-monotypic genus of Andean Cranaidae is defined, associated with a well-defined geographic region, and unloaded of extraneous species which belong to another family. Recognition of variation in heteromorphic males reveals past errors of assignment when only limited samples were available for study.
The family Cranaidae is a group of mainly Andean-Amazonian harvestmen, only recognized in the end of the twentieth century (Kury 1994) and whose diversity is underestimated. Its taxonomy is unsatisfactory and plagued by many monotypic and poorly known genera. The monophyly of this taxon has been recovered in some phylogenetic studies (Orrico and Kury 2009; Sharma and Giribet 2011; Pinto-da-Rocha et al. 2014). Nevertheless, a molecular study by Pinto-da-Rocha et al. (2014) considered it as a member of the Gonyleptidae. However, because Orrico and Kury (2009) found that of the four traditional subfamilies of cranaids, two are microdiverse and the other two are paraphyletic, they proposed to abandon the use of subfamilies at least as currently defined. On the other hand, Kury (2012b) proposed the inclusion of Zamorinae as a fifth subfamily wich, posteriorly was transferred to Nomoclastidae by Kury & Villarreal (2015). In view of this uncertainty in recent literature, the use of subfamilies in Cranaidae is meant here only for convenience of reference of traditional assemblages of species. A phylogenetic analysis project to understand the internal and external relationships of Cranaidae/Cranainae is ongoing by the first author. Cranaidae (as a family) is used here as a neutral term.
Recently, some works have been published addressing varied taxonomy and systematic issues in the family, primarily three systematic works, two papers focusing on the relationship of the genus Phareicranaus Roewer, 1913 (Pinto-da-Rocha and Kury 2003; Pinto-da-Rocha and Bonaldo 2011) and another focused on testing the monophyly of Stygnicranainae (Orrico and Kury 2009). Subsequently, some contributions on the alpha taxonomy of Cranaidae were published, either as (1) transfer of taxa from other families to Cranaidae (Pinto-da-Rocha and Hara 2009; Pinto-da-Rocha et al. 2012), (2) description of new taxa (Kury 2012a, b), (3) detection of ‘false cranaids’ (Villarreal and Kury 2012), or (4) synonymy or revalidation and redescription of some genera (Hara et al. 2014). Those contributions tried to clarify the definition of the genera composing this family, but the taxonomy of cranaids is still confused and most genera are poorly known.
In this paper, the genus Ventrifurca Roewer, 1913 is revisited, its type species is redescribed, a new species is described from Quindío department, Colombia, and a new generic diagnosis is offered. Cayabeus Roewer, 1932 and Microcranaus Roewer, 1913 are considered junior subjective synonyms of Ventrifurca. Two spurious species of Microcranaus are transferred to Manaosbiidae. Comments about the relationships of the genus Ventrifurca within the family are presented, and a diagnostic character in the genital macrosetae is detected for a group of cranaid genera.
Roewer (1913b: 349) described the new subfamily Cranainae in Gonyleptidae with some old and many new genera and species. Of relevance here, he described the following as new: (1) the genus Microcranaus, based on two new species - Microcranaus pustulatus from ‘Ecuador: Cachab’ and Microcranaus gracilis from ‘Surinam: Saramacca’. He designated Microcranaus pustulatus Roewer, 1913 as type species of the genus; (2) the monotypic genus Ventrifurca based on the new species Ventrifurca albipustulata from ‘Columbien: Camelia’; and (3) the genus Rhopalocranaus with four new South American species, designating as type species Rhopalocranaus marginatus Roewer, 1913.
Posteriorly, Roewer (1932: 337 and 346) described in Gonyleptidae Cranainae two new monotypic genera - Cayabeus, based on the new species Cayabeus perlatus from ‘Ecuador (Cayabé)’, which is a misspelling of the town Cayambe (Pichincha), and Angistrius, based on the new species Angistrius abnormis from Alausi.
Goodnight and Goodnight (1947: 40) described in the wastebasket genus Rhopalocranaus (then in Gonyleptidae Cranainae) the new species Rhopalocranaus dybasi from ‘mountains west of Cali, Department of Cauca, Colombia’. Soares and Soares (1948: 593, 609) perpetrated an unlucky synonymy, seemingly based on nothing: (1) Rhopalocranaus Roewer, 1913 = Cranaus Simon, 1879.
Kury (1997: 4) transferred Rhopalocranaus to Manaosbiidae. Kury (2003) in his catalog of New World Laniatores proposed many changes and updates, among which are the following: (1) updated and completed details of locality records of old literature and (2) transferred Rhopalocranaus dybasi to Neocranaus Roewer, 1913, creating the new combination Neocranaus dybasi (Goodnight and Goodnight, 1947).
The standard of description and morphological nomenclature follows Villarreal and Kury (2012) and Kury (2012a, b) and outlines of the dorsal scutum as described in Kury et al. (2007). MS = macrosetae of penis ventral plate. Other abbreviations used: CL = carapace length, CW = carapace width, AL = abdominal scutum length, AW = abdominal scutum width, DSL = dorsal scutum length, Tr = trochanter, Fe = femur, Pa = patella, Ti = tibia, Mt = metatarsus, Ta = tarsus. All measurements are in mm unless otherwise noted. Abbreviations of the repositories cited are FMNH (Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago), IAvH (Instituto Alexander von Humboldt, Colombia), MNHN (Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris), MNRJ (Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro), QCAZ (Museo de Zoologia, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Quito), and SMF (Senckenberg Museum, Frankfurt). The A-E system of naming the macrosetae of ventral plate follows Kury and Villarreal (2015).
In the following list, literature entries are not exhaustive (these can be found in Kury 2003), but rather restricted to the critical contributions.
Cranaidae Roewer, 1913
Ventrifurca Roewer, 1913
Ventrifurca abnormis (Goodnight and Goodnight, 1947) comb. nov.
♂ holotype (SMF RII 261/5), from Ecuador, Chimborazo, Alausi, WWF ecoregion NT0145 (Northwestern Andean montane forests).
Lateral and posterior rows of yellow granules of scutum continuous all along, but with 2 clusters at scutal groove and on the lateral margins of area III. Free tergite III with scattered yellow granules. Scutal area I with contrasting yellow tubercles in the middle and posteriorly. Ocularium, carapace, scutal area II with yellow tubercles (Figure 14A). Basichelicerite short. Pedipalpal femur ectally unarmed (Figure 14B). Stigmatic area on males with robust uniramous median apophysis (Figure 14B,C). Ratio Fe IV of ♂/scutum = 2.3.
Ventrifurca albipustulata Roewer, 1913
Tarsal formula of Ventrifurca albipustulata (numerals in parentheses represent number of distitarsomeres)
QCAZ AK 0262
Ventrifurca spp. body and appendage measurements, expressed in millimeters
♂ (MNRJ 19197)
♀ (MNRJ 19197)
♂ (MNRJ 8351)
♀ (MNRJ 19387)
(1) 1 ♂ 1 ♀ syntypes of Ventrifurca albipustulata (SMF RI 846, photographed, Roewer cited only 1 male ‘type’ , but the type series consists of 1 male and 1 female) from ‘Columbien’ without further locality data, while the publication has ‘Columbien Camelia’ and Kury (2003) extrapolated ‘Cafetal Camelia, Antioquia’ based on the locality of Swiss Führmann and Mayor 1910 Expedition. Roewer studied the material from this expedition in other contributions, but there is no evidence that this specific material is prevenient from that. There are many places called ‘La Camelia’ in Colombia, and we do not have evidence to pinpoint one as the type locality, especially because the actual label bears nothing further than ‘Colombia’. (2) ♂ holotype of Microcranaus pustulatus (SMF RI 851, photographed), from Ecuador, ‘Cachab’. There is a Cachabé railway station of collecting by Rosenberg of BMNH, in the Esmeraldas Province at 500 ft. This must correspond to Esmeraldas, San Javier de Cachaví, ca. 138 m, 1.06611/−78.77722, WWF ecoregion NT0178 (Western Ecuador moist forests). There is a railway station on the Cachabí River at 150 m, Esmeraldas, currently known as Urbina, very close to San Javier. Kury (2003) interpolated ‘Carchí Province’ Cachabí River, but these localities are more to the west, already in the Esmeraldas province. (3) 2 ♀ [wrongly reported as ♂] syntypes of Cayabeus perlatus (SMF RI 1423 and MNHN Coll. Simon 20319, Roewer number 5377, both photographed), Ecuador, Pichincha, Cayambe [misspelled as ‘Cayabé’], WWF ecoregion NT0145 (Northwestern Andean montane forests).
Other material examined
4 ♂ 1 ♀ (MNRJ 19197) Ecuador, Esmeraldas, Chuchuvi, Cumbres Andinas, N 00.88404°, W 078.51437°, alt: 742 m, 16.iii.2011, leg. A Chagas, A Giupponi, A Kury and M Vega, WWF ecoregion NT0145 (Northwestern Andean montane forests). 1 ♂ (QCAZ AK 0262), same data. 1 ♂ 1 ♀ (MNRJ 19386) Ecuador, Esmeraldas, Tundaloma Lodge, near Calderón. N 01.18277°; W 078.75259°. Alt. 55 m. 8-9.ii.2014, leg. A Kury and A Giupponi, WWF ecoregion NT0178 (Western Ecuador moist forests).
Lateral and posterior rows of yellow granules of scutum irregularly doubled or tripled and continuous all along. Free tergite III with row of yellow granules along its extension. Scutal area I without contrasting yellow tubercles. Ocularium, carapace, scutal area II without yellow tubercles (Figures 1A,C and 5A). Basichelicerite short. Pedipalpal femur ectally unarmed (Figure 8D, J). Stigmatic area on males with short bifurcated median apophysis, which may be extremely reduced (Figures 1B,C,E, 5C,E, and 7B,D). Ratio Fe IV of ♂/scutum = 1.4. Stylar cap short (Figure 11E).
Redescription (♂ MNRJ 19197)
Body and appendage measurements are in Table 2.
Dorsum. Dorsal scutum type beta without conspicuous coda (convergent-sided terminal area) (Figures 1A and 5A). Scutum rather flattened in lateral view (Figure 1C,D,E). Abdominal scutum widest at groove III level; lateral margin of dorsal scutum with yellow rounded tubercles from carapace to area III, following outline of scutum (Figure 5A). Ocularium without median depression, armed with a paramedian pair of acuminate tubercles set widely apart (Figure 1D) and some small tubercles. Mesotergum well delimited, divided into 3 well-marked areas: area I divided into left and right halves by longitudinal straight groove, and with 1 conspicuous spine on each side and four little granules (Figure 5A); area II penetrating subtly into area I, with a median transverse row of small tubercles; area III with a pair of paramedian acuminate erect high subparallel spines, located near posterior margin, posterior half of this area densely covered with yellow and rounded tubercles (Figures 1A and 5A). Posterior border of scutum straight, armed with a row of granules. Free tergites I-II with a pair of paramedian granules and 1 slightly larger laterodistal on each side, contrasting yellow; free tergite III armed with a posterior row of 16 yellow conspicuous tubercles, the paramedian pair much stouter and concolorous with background (Figure 1A,E).
Venter. Stigmatic area with 3 pairs of tiny granules aligned in two longitudinal and divergent rows and 2 enlarged parallel apophyses (formed by multiple tubercles fused) with common base and rounded apex on the medial area of the posterior border (Figures 1B and 5D,E).
Chelicera (Figure 8A,B). Chelicera slightly swollen, bulla with a group of 2 to 3 proximal and 1 ectoproximal tubercles; hand enlarged, with some frontal tubercles and a patch of about 5 to 6 mesal setiferous tubercles. Fixed finger with a dentate lamella and 1 conspicuous tooth on the proximal half.
Pedipalpi (Figure 8D,E). Femur, patella and tibia elongate; trochanter with 2 dorsal tubercle, 2 minute dorsodistal granules; ventrally with 2 tubercles. Femur cylindrical with a discrete row of ventral spaced granules, about 40% DSL. Patella unarmed, slightly swollen distally, about 1/4 of DSL. Tibia cylindrical, about 1/4 of DSL, ectal with 3 spines (iIi) and mesal with four (iiII). Tarsus without coarse dorsal granulation, ectal with 4 spines (IiIi) and mesal with 4 spines (IiIi).
Legs (Figure 8 C,F,G,H,I). Trochanter II with conspicuous dorsal tubercle, 2 retroventral and another retrodorsal. Trochanter III with 3 prolateral tubercles, 1 prodorsal and 1 retrodorsal and 2 large retrolateral and 2 proventral and retroventral. Trochanter IV with 1 large prodorsal tubercle, 2 retrolateral tubercles, distal 1 much larger, 1 ventral blunt tubercle. Femora I-III straight, with numerous rows of granules. Femur III furthermore with 1 retrodorsal distal spine and 1 proximal retroventral tubercle. Femur IV slightly sinuous with 6 longitudinal rows of granules; retrodorsal row with 3 larger proximal and 1 distal; those of both ventral rows very small; retroventral row with 1 curved subdistal spines and proventral row with a large curved perpendicular spine. Ratio Fe IV/scutum = 1.4. Tarsal counts in Table 1.
Genitalia (Figures 10 and 11). Ventral plate (VP) subrectangular with mid-constriction and apical parabolic concavity. Ventral surface of VP with 2 lung-shaped fields of needle microsetae each with a distal patch of asparagus-like microsetae. All macrosetae (MS) displaced to distal. Set MS A-B composed of 2 pairs or short lateral setae. 3 to 4 pairs of short curved MS C with helycoidal apex. MS D: 1 pair, strongly displaced to dorsal and curved apically. MS E: 2 pairs, very small, located on laterodistal flange, between groups A and C. Glans sac columnar elongate. Stylus substraight, without processes. Capellum formed by fused dorsal and ventral stylar caps with a pair of acuminate lateral prongs and short acuminate mid prong.
Variation (Figure 5E). The apophyses of stigmatic area may be either isolated or fused at base, as well as buttons or longer finger-like projections, with combinations between these.
Female. Similar to the males. Differential characters are as follows: without frontal hump and abdominal areas high giving the body a non-flattened appearance; spines of the abdominal area I and ocularium short. Paramedian tubercles of free tergite III larger than the males (Figure 5B). Stigmatic area short (non-elongated) without posterior process (Figure 5D). Chelicera not swollen. Pedipalpi sexually dimorphic, slightly elongated, with spines on the tibia and tarsus smaller than the male (Figure 8J,K). Legs with the longitudinal row of tubercles less conspicuous, without none dorsal or lateral tubercle conspicuously greater.
Ventrifurca caffeinica sp. nov.
Tarsal formula of Ventrifurca caffeinica sp. nov.
Species name is a neo-Latin adjective from the substance caffeine, referring to the international fame of Quindío department as a coffee producer.
Holotype: ♂ (MNRJ 8351) Colombia, Quindío, Filandia, b. Palacio, v. Biscocho 1,700 m 30.xi.2002 leg. L Mendoza. Paratypes: 1 ♂ (MNRJ 7038) Colombia, Quindío, Bosque de Bremen, Filandia x.1996 leg. C Rodríguez; 1 ♂ (IAvH 300053) Colombia, Quindío, Municipio. Filandia, Vda. Cruces, Finca Bosquinza, 1,900 m 4°42′15″ N 75°37′57″ W 04.vi.2002 Plantación de pino 6 leg. G Jiménez & MF Reina; 1 ♀ (MNRJ 19387) Colombia, Quindío, b. Silencio ix.1998 leg. G Ramírez.
Lateral and posterior rows of yellow granules of scutum as a single line and interrupted posteriorly with only a few granules behind spines of area III. Free tergite III without row of yellow granules. Scutal area I with only a few contrasting yellow tubercles around paramedian spines. Ocularium, carapace, scutal area II without yellow tubercles (Figures 2A,C and 6A). Basichelicerite robust and long (Figures 2A and 6A). Pedipalpal femur with ectal row of stout spines (Figure 9A,I). Stigmatic area on males with very long cylindrical uniramous median acuminate apophysis (Figures 2B,E and 6A,D,F). Ratio Fe IV of ♂/scutum = 1.4. Stylar cap much elongate (Figure 12C,D,E).
Body and appendage measurements are in Table 2.
Dorsal scutum type beta elongate without conspicuous coda (convergent-sided terminal area) (Figures 2A and 6A). Scutum rather flattened in lateral view, excepted for base of spines of area III (Figure 2C). Abdominal scutum widest at groove III level; lateral margin of dorsal scutum with yellow rounded tubercles from carapace to area III, following outline of scutum as a discontinuous row (Figures 2A and 6A). Ocularium without median depression, armed with a paramedian pair of acuminate tubercles set widely apart (Figures 2D and 4C, D) and some small tubercles. Mesotergum well delimited, divided into 3 well-marked areas: area I divided into left and right halves by longitudinal straight groove, and with 1 conspicuous spine on each side and 14 little granules of which a few are contrasting yellow (Figure 6A); area II penetrating subtly into area I, with a median transverse row of small tubercles; area III with a pair of paramedian acuminate erect high subparallel spines, located near posterior margin, each with 2 to 3 accessory spines; posterior half of this area with a row of yellow tubercles (Figures 2A and 6A). Posterior border of scutum straight, armed with 3 yellow granules each side plus a pair of paramedian larger ones. Free tergites I-II with a pair of paramedian granules and 1 to 2 smaller laterodistal on each side; free tergite III armed with a posterior row of 13 tubercles, the paramedian pair much stouter (Figure 6A).
Stigmatic area with 2 groups of tiny anterior granules; 2 clusters of granules near of stigmata and 5 to 6 large granules each side of the posterior border. Posteroventral process cylindrical and large, located on the medial area of the posterior border (Figures 2B,C and 6D,F).
Chelicera (Figure 6A,B,C)
Chelicera slightly swollen, bulla with 2 proximal and 1 to 2 ectoproximal tubercles; hand enlarged, with some frontal tubercles arranged in 2 rows and a patch of about 3 mesal setiferous tubercles. Fixed finger with a dentate lamella and 1 conspicuous tooth on the proximal half.
Pedipalpus (Figure 9A,B,C)
Trochanter with 2 dorsal tubercles, 2 minute dorsodistal granules; ventrally with 2 tubercles. Femur cylindrical, slightly elongated, armed with longitudinal rows of tubercles, the dorsal and mesal rows are larger, and with a ventroproximal large tubercle; patella and tibia normal (not unusually elongated as in other members of the genus); patella curved, with some dorsal granules; tibia dorsally granulated, ectal with 3 spines (Iii) and mesal with four (IiII), the most distal curved and strong; tarsus without coarse granulation, ectal with 4 spines (IiIi) and mesal with 4 spines (IiIi).
Legs (Figure 9D,E,F,G,H)
Trochanter II with 2 + 1 + 2 ventral (3 rows, middle larger), 1 prodorsal distal, 2 retrodorsal (distal larger), 2 retrolateral, 1 retroventral tubercles. Trochanter III with 2 + 1 + 2 ventral (3 rows, middle larger), 2 proventral, 2 retroventral, 2 (1 much larger) retrolateral, 2 prodorsal, 2 (distal larger) retrodorsal and 2 small prolateral tubercles. Trochanter IV with 2 + 1 + 2 ventral (3 rows, middle larger), 1 large prodorsal, 3 retrodorsal clustered, 2 small prolateral, 2 retrolateral distal 1 much larger, tubercles. Femora I-III straight, with numerous rows of granules. Femur III furthermore with 1 retrolateral proximal and 1 retrodorsal distal tubercles. Femur IV straight, with 6 longitudinal rows of granules; ones in retrolateral row larger, 1 retrodorsal distal tubercle. Tibia I-IV straight, with numerous rows of granules. Tibia IV with a retrolateral row of tubercules. Ratio Fe IV/scutum = 1.4. Tarsal counts in Table 3.
Ventral plate (VP) subrectangular with deep mid-constriction and apical parabolic concavity. Ventral surface of VP with 2 lung-shaped fields of needle microsetae each with a distal patch of asparagus-like microsetae. All macrosetae (MS) displaced to distal. Set MS A-B composed of 2 pairs or short lateral setae. 3 pairs of short curved MS C with helycoidal apex. MS D: 1 pair, strongly displaced to dorsal and curved apically. MS E: 2 pairs, very small, located on laterodistal flange, ventrally at group C. Glans sac columnar elongate. Stylus straight, without processes. Capellum formed by marginally fused dorsal and ventral stylar caps with pair of acuminate lateral prongs and very stout acuminate mid prong.
There are only two beta males in the lots examined; one of them has apophyses of stigmatic area reduced. Spines of the ocularium can be subparallel or slightly divergent in frontal view.
Similar to the males. Differential characters are as follows: without frontal hump and abdominal areas high, giving the body a non-flattened appearance; spines of the abdominal area I and ocularium short (Figure 4E,F). Paramedian tubercles of free tergite III larger than in the males (Figures 6E). Stigmatic area short (non-elongated) without posterior process. Chelicera not swollen. Pedipalpi sexually dimorphic, with tubercles smaller than in the male (Figures 9I, J), and more distal ectal spine of the tibia straight and normal. Legs with the longitudinal row of tubercles less conspicuous.
Ventrifurca dybasi (Goodnight and Goodnight, 1947) comb. nov.
Rhopalocranaus dybasi Goodnight and Goodnight, 1947: 40, fig. 20.
Neocranaus dybasi: Kury 2003: 95.
♀ holotype (FMNH), from Colombia, Valle del Cauca, Mountains W Cali, WWF ecoregion NT0109 (Cauca Valley montane forests). Examined.
Diagnosis (Figure 3)
Lateral and posterior rows of yellow granules of scutum as a single line (excepted at carapace where they are clustered) and interrupted posteriorly with numerous granules postero-lateral on area III. Free tergite III with row of yellow granules along its extension. Scutal area I with an arch of yellow tubercles interrupted in laterals. Ocularium, carapace, scutal area II with scattered yellow tubercles. Pedipalpal femur with ectal row of stout spines.
Manaosbiidae Roewer, 1943.
Rhopalocranaus columbianus (Roewer, 1963) comb. nov., new familial assignment
♂ holotype 1 ♂ 2 ♀ paratypes (SMF 12707), from Colombia, Cauca, Monterredondo (03°13′N - 76°12′W), 1,400 m.
Chelicerae, pedipalpi and legs yellowish brown, dorsal scutum dark brown. Scutal areas higher than ocularium in lateral view; ocularium with 2 high and acuminate tubercles; area I, III with a pair of high and acute tubercles. Free tergites I-III each with a pair of paramedian tubercles (higher on III). Penis: ventral plate in the same direction of the penis main axis, subrectangular in dorsal view, with lateral margins slightly divergent and the distal border slightly concave. Chaetotaxy: with only 2 pairs of macrosetae (MS) A, straight or slightly curved, cylindrical and acuminated, with a gap between MS A1-A2. One pair distally positioned, near to laterodistal corner of VP, the other 1 pair, basally positioned, together but dorsally to MS B. Macrosetae C with 3 pairs of curved and long setae distally located (the basal most slightly separate from the distal pair). MS D with only 1 pair of short setae, located dorsally to MS C. MS group by MS E group composed by 2 pairs reduced and rounded setae. Stylus with globose glans, apex straight and cylindrical, without stylar caps or other structures. Male basitarsus I moderately spindled and undivided.
Camelianus gracilis (Roewer, 1913) comb. nov., new familial assignment
Microcranaus gracilis Roewer, 1913b: 355, fig. 138.
‘Microcranaus’ gracilis: Kury, 2003: 206.
♀ holotype [wrongly reported as male] (SMF RI-849), from Surinam, Saramacca.
Diagnosis (based on female holotype)
Body russet, scutum, tergites and sternites darker, mottled in black. Appendages pale yellow with loose black reticle (according to Roewer 1913b). Dorsum. Anterior margin of carapace with three tubercles each side. Ocularium with 2 conical dorsal tubercles (about size of eye), 2 anterior tubercles, 2 posterior tubercles. Carapace with 3 to 4 tubercles behind each side of ocularium. Lateral margin with four tubercles near coxa III. Area I with a large apophysis with rounded apex, surrounded by 6 tubercles, 3 tubercles each side; II with 2 to 3 tubercles each side; III with 2 divergent pointed apophyses, directed backwards, with 2 tubercles each side. Posterior margin with 8 tubercles. Free tergites I with 14 tubercles, 1 pair higher (about eye high); II with 4 to 5 tubercles each side, with a pair of wide and pointed tubercles (larger than tergite width), 2 tubercles between largest ones; III with 10 tubercles, 3 of them larger. Anal operculum with 10 tubercles. Cheliceral segment I with 7 tubercles on lateral margin of bulla. Tarsal formula: 6(3); 11(3); 6; 6. Male unknown.
Discussion and conclusions
Rationale of the synonymies
Roewer (1913a, b, 1932), as typical of his system, used supposed differences (some of them known to be irrelevant, see for example de Piza 1940: 313 ff.; de Piza 1942: 403 ff.; Ringuelet 1959: 188) in the armature of the scutal areas and of the free tergites to separate these genera, recognizing three categories (‘spine’ , ‘small spine’ , and ‘tubercle’). Furthermore, Ventrifurca was isolated from the other two genera by having a short bifurcate projection on stigmatic area, and Microcranaus isolated by having tarsus I, III, and IV hexamerous instead of heptamerous. In our sample of V. albipustulata (six specimens), tarsomere range is 7-8/14-16/7/7; curiously none has 6 tarsomeres on leg I. The tarsomere count, said by Roewer (inspired in Sørensen) and followers to be fairly constant (Sørensen 1902: 3; Roewer 1913a: 5; Goodnight and Goodnight 1953: 36), has later proven to be variable, and 5 versus 6 or 6 versus 7 tarsomeres were already found in many species (e.g., Soares 1943: 223; de Mello-Leitão 1949: 3; Muñoz-Cuevas 1973: 230). The paired apophyses of the stigmatic area would be the most significant feature to diagnose Ventrifurca. However, this feature is herein demonstrated to be variable intraspecifically, which led different male specimens to be described as different genera (see ‘variation’ above and Figure 5E).
Interchange of species to and from Ventrifurca/Rhopalocranaus
It is not unusual, in works done under the Roewerian paradigm, to join completely unrelated species which happen to coincide in tarsal counts and area armature. M. columbianus has been originally included in Microcranaus under such constraints. However, examination of the type material by one of us, including male genitalia, led to its placement in Manaosbiidae, where it fits in Rhopalocranaus by the shape of the ventral plate of the penis, pattern of their macrosetae, and ornamentation of the dorsal scutum and ocularium (a review of Manaosbiidae by RPR is in course). On the other hand, following the same reasoning of Roewer, Goodnight and Goodnight (1947) discovered a species here included in Ventrifurca after revision of the holotype, but described it under the then amorphous assemblage Rhopalocranaus, namely R. dybasi. Only much later, Kury (1997) transferred Rhopalocranaus from Cranainae to Manaosbiidae. However, as demonstrated above, R. dybasi, even known only by the female, is a Cranaidae and matches the present diagnosis of Ventrifurca.
Distribution of Ventrifurca
The distribution of cranaid species is primarily associated with the Andean and Amazonian forest. It is currently difficult to find any pattern of distribution of the genera in this family due to (1) the unsatisfactory taxonomy with many monotypic/meaningless genera, (2) species known from only one locality, and (3) poorly studied collections in the Andean region. A few comments can be made on two monophyletic groups: (1) the ‘longipalp cranaids’ (formerly Stygnicranainae) which are distributed in the south of Colombia and north of Ecuador associated to Northwestern Andean montane forests (Orrico and Kury 2009) and (2) the genus Phareicranaus which has some species groups (Villarreal, unpublished data), one of them associated to north of south America (Venezuela, Panama and Trinidad) and another well distributed in the Amazonian Basin (Brazil, Ecuador, Peru).
Although only three species of Ventrifurca are known, this could be a more diverse genus and seems to be restricted to the western range of the Colombian Andes and Ecuador, from north of Ecuador about 700 km north into northwestern Colombia. Reliable records of Ventrifurca species are only from WWF ecoregions NT0109 and NT0145, both belonging to the larger region Northern Andean montane forests. This corresponds to Morrone’s (2014) Cauca Province. On the other hand, the type locality of Microcranaus pustulatus, the ‘Cachab’ - which is here interpreted as Río Cachabí, at much lower altitude, already in the Choco-Darien moist forests region (matching Morrone’s Western Ecuador Province) - might be inaccurate, so Ventrifurca can be said to be safely recorded only from Northern Andean montane forest. Another interpretation is that the original locality report is accurate, and Ventrifurca is much wider spread than we think, descending into the Pacific lowland forest. Only further collecting expeditions will allow putting those hypotheses to test.
Relationships of Ventrifurca
A great number of Cranaidae (e.g., Phalangodus, Phareicranaus in part, Carsevennia Roewer, 1913, Heterocranaus Roewer, 1913, Yania Roewer, 1919) has short, compact pedipalpi, with femur strongly convex dorsally and spined mainly on the males. But a more slender, sexually dimorphic pedipalpus, slightly elongate in males of V. albipustulata, hints to some relationship with the three genera of ‘longipalp cranaids’ which are thought to constitute a clade (see illustrations of all in Orrico and Kury 2009). In Tryferos, the pedipalpus of the male is immensely elongate (femur to tibia) and femur unarmed while the female has regular podomeres. Agathocranaus is known only from a male, but podomeres are only moderately long. Of special interest in Agathocranaus is the circular/elliptical transverse section of tarsus (instead of hemispherical). This feature is consistently associated with elongate pedipalpi and is known in Biantidae, Epedanidae, Stygnidae (Kury and Pérez-G 2007; Pinto-da-Rocha 1997; Kury 2008, 2009), and some Gonyleptidae (Caelopyginae, Sodreaninae, and Progonyleptoidellinae) (Pinto-da-Rocha 2002; Pinto-da-Rocha and Bragagnolo 2011). Stygnicranaus appears to represent a step further in the evolution of ‘longipalpness,’ because it has the same tarsal conformation as Agathocranaus, but with greater elongation of Fe-Ti both in males and in females. Even if Ventrifurca caffeinica sp. nov. is an exception, frequently species with ornamentation on the posterior edge of the stigmatic area have at least males if not both sexes with elongation of leastwise one of the segments of the pedipalpus, e.g., Angistrisoma atrolutea Roewer, 1932, A. fuscum Roewer, 1932, Angistrius abnormis Roewer, 1932, Ventripila marginata Roewer, 1917, and Ventrisudis mira Roewer, 1963.
The guitar-shaped penis ventral plate, the distal concentration of macrosetae, and the presence of a stylar cap (thus called by Kury 2012a, also capellum in Orrico and Kury 2009), all present in Ventrifurca, are quite widespread in some Cranaidae genera (e.g., Heterocranaus, Chiriboga, and Metacranaus in Pinto-da-Rocha and Bonaldo 2011; Zannicranaus in Kury 2012a). More strikingly similar is the greatly medially shifted pair of dorsal macrosetae present in Stygnicranaus and Metacranaus. As male genital morphology is largely unknown in Cranaidae, the evolution of their features is hitherto only poorly understood, a scenario that is gradually changing with focused work on this family.
This study is co-funded by grants CNPq (477502/2012-1 and 504327/2012-7) and FAPERJ (E-26/111.431/2012 and E-26/111.705/2012) to ABK, CAPES (PEC-PG 5900115) to OVM, and FAPESP (2009/17206-5; BIOTA, 2013/50297-0), NSF (DOB 1343578), and NASA to RPR. We would like to thank Peter Jäger (SMF) for the hospitality in Frankfurt to RPR, Mark Judson and Elise-Anne Leguin (MNHN) idem in Paris, Claudia Medina (IAvH) for hospitality to ABK in Villa de Leyva, Petra Sierwald (FMNH) for sending type material, and Álvaro Barragán and Mauricio Vega (QCAZ) for helping out in ABK’s expedition to Ecuador. Maria Cleide de Mendonça (MNRJ) provided optical facilities.
- Goodnight CJ, Goodnight ML (1947) Phalangida from tropical America. Fieldiana Zool 32(1):1–58Google Scholar
- Goodnight CJ, Goodnight ML (1953) The opilionid fauna of Chiapas, Mexico, and adjacent areas (Arachnoidea, Opiliones). Am Mus Novit 1610:1–81Google Scholar
- Hara MR, Pinto-da-Rocha R, Villarreal MO (2014) Revision of the cranaid genera Phalangodus, Iquitosa and Aguaytiella (Opiliones: Laniatores: Gonyleptoidea). Zootaxa 3814(4):567–580PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kury AB (1994) The genus Yania and other presumed Tricommatidae from South American highlands (Opiliones, Cranaidae, Prostygninae). Revue Arachnologique 10(7):137–145Google Scholar
- Kury AB (1997) The genera Saramacia Roewer and Syncranaus Roewer, with notes on the status of the Manaosbiidae (Opiliones, Laniatores). Bol Mus Nac Rio de J (Nov Ser) (Zool) 374:1–22Google Scholar
- Kury AB (2003) Annotated catalogue of the Laniatores of the New World (Arachnida, Opiliones). Rev Iber Aracnol Vol Especial Monográfico 1:1–337Google Scholar
- Kury AB (2008) On the systematic position of Dino Loman and Toccolus Roewer (Opiliones, Laniatores, Epedanidae), with the description of a new species from western Java, Indonesia. Zootaxa 1932:61–68Google Scholar
- Kury AB (2009) A new genus of Stygninae from a relictual rainforest in Ceará, northeastern Brazil (Opiliones, Laniatores, Stygnidae). Zootaxa 2057:63–68Google Scholar
- Kury AB (2012a) A new genus of Cranaidae from Ecuador (Opiliones: Laniatores). Zootaxa 3314:31–44Google Scholar
- Kury AB (2012b) First report of the male of Zamora granulata Roewer 1928, with implications on the higher taxonomy of the Zamorinae (Opiliones, Laniatores, Cranaidae). Zootaxa 3546:29–42Google Scholar
- Kury AB, Pérez-G, A (2007). Biantidae Thorell, 1889. Pp 176-179. In: Pinto-da-Rocha, R., G. Machado & G. Giribet (eds.). Harvestmen: the biology of the Opiliones. Harvard University Press, Cambridge and London. x + 597 pages
- Kury AB, Villarreal-M O, Costa CS (2007) Redescription of the type species of Cynorta Koch, 1839 (Arachnida, Opiliones, Cosmetidae). J Arachnol 35(2):325–333View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kury AB, Villarreal MO (2015) The prickly blade mapped: establishing homologies and a chaetotaxy for macrosetae of penis ventral plate in Gonyleptoidea (Arachnida, Opiliones, Laniatores). Zool J Linnean Soc 174:1–46.
- de Mello-Leitão CF (1949) Famílias, subfamília, espécies generos novos de opiliões e notas de sinonimia. Bol Mus Nac Rio de J (Nov Ser) (Zool) 94:1–33Google Scholar
- Morrone JJ (2014) Biogeographical regionalisation of the Neotropical region. Zootaxa 3782(1):001–110, http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3782.1.1
- Muñoz-Cuevas A (1973) Sur les caractères génériques de la familie des Gonyleptidae (Arachnida, Opilions, Laniatores). Bull Mus Nat Hist Nat (3) 87(113):225–234Google Scholar
- Orrico VGD, Kury AB (2009) A cladistic analysis of the Stygnicranainae Roewer, 1913 (Arachnida, Opiliones, Cranaidae) – where do longipalp cranaids belong? Zool J Linnean Soc 157:470–494View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pinto-da-Rocha R (1997) Systematic review of the Neotropical family Stygnidae (Opiliones, Laniatores, Gonyleptoidea). Arq Zool 33(4):163–342View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pinto-da-Rocha R (2002) Systematic review and cladistic analysis of the Caelopyginae (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae). Arq Zool 36(4):357–464Google Scholar
- Pinto-da-Rocha R, Bonaldo AB (2011) Species relationships in the Neotropical genus Phareicranaus Roewer 1913 (Opiliones: Cranaidae): two new species and new data from penial morphology. Zootaxa 3135:1–34Google Scholar
- Pinto-da-Rocha R, Bragagnolo C (2011) Systematic revision and cladistic analysis of the Brazilian subfamily Sodreaninae (Opiliones: Gonyleptidae). Invertebr Syst 24 [“2010”]:509–538
- Pinto-da-Rocha R, Hara MR (2009) New familial assignments for three species of Neotropical harvestmen based on cladistic analysis (Arachnida: Opiliones: Laniatores). Zootaxa 2241:33–46Google Scholar
- Pinto-da-Rocha R, Kury AB (2003) Phylogenetic analysis of Santinezia with description of five new species (Opiliones, Laniatores, Cranaidae). J Arachnol 31(2):173–208View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pinto-da-Rocha R, Benedetti AR, Vasconcelos EG, Hara MR (2012) New systematics assignments in Gonyleptoidea (Arachnida, Opiliones, Laniatores). Zookeys 198:25–68PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pinto-da-Rocha R, Bragagnolo C, Marques FPLM, Antunes M Jr (2014) Phylogeny of harvestmen family Gonyleptidae inferred from a multilocus approach (Arachnida: Opiliones). Cladistics 30:519–539. doi:10.1111/cla.12065 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de Piza ST Jr (1940) Breves considerações em torno de alguns nóvos Gonyléptidas do Brasil. Rev Agric 15(7–8):312–324Google Scholar
- de Piza ST Jr (1942) A respeito da sistemática de alguns opiliões. Rev Bras Biol 2(4):403–416Google Scholar
- Ringuelet RA (1959) Los arácnidos Argentinos del orden Opiliones. Rev Mus Argent Cienc Nat Bernardino Rivadavia 5(2):127–439, figs 1–62, plates 1–20
- Roewer CF (1913a) Die Familie der Gonyleptiden der Opiliones-Laniatores. Arch Naturgesch (Abt A Original-Arbeiten) 79(4): 1–256, pl. 1a.
- Roewer CF (1913b) Die Familie der Gonyleptiden de Opiliones - Laniatores. [part 2]. Arch Naturgesch (Abt A Original-Arbeiten) 79(5): 257–472, pl. 2
- Roewer CF (1932) Weitere Weberknechte VII (7. Ergänzung der: "Weberknechte der Erde", 1923) (Cranainae). Arch Naturgesch (NF) 1(2):275–350Google Scholar
- Roewer CF (1963) Opiliones aus Peru und Colombien. [Arachnida Arthrogastra aus Peru V]. Senckenb Biol 44(1):5–72Google Scholar
- Sharma PP, Giribet G (2011) The evolutionary and biogeographic history of the armoured harvestmen – Laniatores phylogeny based on ten molecular markers, with the description of two new families of Opiliones (Arachnida). Invertebr Syst 25:106–145View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Simon E (1879) Essai d'une classification des Opiliones Mecostethi. Remarques synonymiques et descriptions d'espèces nouvelles. Première partie. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique, 22: 183–241.Google Scholar
- Soares BAM (1943) Notas sobre opiliões II. Pap Avulsos Dep Zool (Sao Paulo) 3(15):221–227Google Scholar
- Soares BAM, Soares HEM (1948) Monografia dos gêneros de opiliões neotrópicos I. Pap Avulsos Dep Zool (Sao Paulo) 5(9):553–636Google Scholar
- Sørensen WE (1902) Gonyleptiden (Opiliones, Laniatores). Ergebnisse der Hamburger Magalhaensischen Sammelreise 6(5):1–36Google Scholar
- Villarreal MO, Kury AB (2012) Licornus Roewer, 1932: newly transferred to Ampycinae and first record of the family Gonyleptidae (Opiliones: Laniatores) from Venezuela. Zootaxa 3544:71–78Google Scholar
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.